You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
The Psychoanalytic Review, in one incarnation or another, dates back to 1913, which makes it the first psychoanalytic journal to be published in the United States, and the oldest continuously published psychoanalytic journal in the world. For me, there is special significance in the fact that it was concerned with psychotic processes. Its early writings, mediated by co-editors William Alanson White and Smith Ely Jeliffe, flowed from work in St. Elizabeth's in Washington, D.C. (for early psychoanalytic politics surrounding the Review, see Silver, 2002).
The Review appeared less than five years after Freud's visit to Clark University. Freud and Jung did not much care for the United States. They called American men sloppy and American women domineering. But somewhere Freud remarked that Americans were practical and crazy enough to find ways to work with psychosis (not with the true gold of psychoanalysis, of course, but some alloy). There are many threads to pull here, one of which involves the pervasive use of madness in Freud's own discourse (Eigen, 1986).
Freud spoke of falling in love, identification with leaders, and dreaming as kinds of everyday madness. His structural concepts were fed by psychotic phenomenology: id as out of contact with external reality, no negation or law of contradiction; ego as hallucinatory and reality testing; superego careening into mad self-attacker. A thread of Freud's portrayal traces madness in the human condition, displacing sin with madness. We know madness through madness, as something in us, a kind of still small voice perhaps, which calls ways we behave and are constituted mad.