You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
The recent centennial celebration of Freud's Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality has brought to my awareness a major fact likely to shed light on an experience familiar to parents and to psychoanalysts: “polymorphous perversity” of the child has overshadowed adolescence.
Of course Freud's successors have not failed to highlight the characteristic traits, particularly the difficulties and the suffering that occur at adolescence both in the development of a given subject as well as for his or her family. Added to this is the impact of adolescent malaise on the culture of a society and its era. It nevertheless seems to me that our approaches are sidestepped by the two extremes of the psychosexual chain: to begin with the narcissistic polymorphism of the newborn child incites epistemophilic curiosity; and at the end, the paradigm of neurosis with its optimal completion in genitality.
We know only too well how fruitful this schema has been. The narcissism of the “polymorphous-perverse-and-theoretician” child has supported both the Kleinian revolution, which at the same time distanced itself from the Freudian model to develop