You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
Narcissism represents … the restoration of a happy love, and conversely, an actual happy love corresponds to the primal condition in which object-libido and ego-libido cannot be distinguished.
Following a brief introduction I address the relationships of twins from five different perspectives: the Intimate Connection, the Mirror Image and Complementarity, Object- and Self-Representation, Self and Object or Rivalry, and Intersubjective Communication. This approach attempts to understand twin relationships and the individual development of twins in terms of their intense mutual dependence, akin to infantile symbiosis, and in terms of narcissism. In their similarity to each other, twins may choose each other as love objects even as they see themselves in the other. That is, a twin may “love what he himself is” or “someone who was once part of himself.” This “type of object-choice … must be termed ‘narcissistic’” (Freud, 1914, pp. 90, 88). Such “cathexis of an undifferentiated self-object” is considered to be “primary narcissism” (Burstein, 1977, p. 103). Hoffer (1952) describes primary narcissism as “the lack of all qualities discriminating between self and not-self, inside and outside” (p. 33).
A remarkable event occurred while I was on faculty at Syracuse University, where I supervised the treatment of a twin by a graduate student.1 She was doing a practicum at a counseling center in