You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
Many analysts (Bollas, Casement, Bion, Winnicott, Stern, etc.) emphasize the experiential aspect of the analytic process in which we are generally the first to know the emotions/experiences that our patients do not allow themselves to feel. This aliveness within the intersubjective field where the patient's emotional world engages the emotional world of the analyst allows us to translate our analysands’ nonverbal experience into words. I will demonstrate these by describing the process with my first analytic patient: Before I could possibly know the details of his perversely intimate relationship with his mother, this interpersonal relating with all its nuances appeared first and mainly in the analytic relationship as I began to get closer to his internal world. I will discuss a dream I had had just before starting analysis with him and this dream seemed to capture his internal object world, which I came to know only at a later stage in analysis. I will also discuss how our analysands feel whether we surrender our psyches to their emotional realities and how our difficulty embracing certain experiences of our patients might communicate to them that we are reluctant to get close to those parts of them that need to be held, understood and transformed.