You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
In my previous text, which is the predecessor of the current one, by acting within Freud's text, I stated that inescapable traumatic impulses tended to gain a comprehensive resemblance with the drive via internalization and connected this proposition (by giving additional details on the fact that phylogenesis refers to the experiences of social history rather than biology) with Freud's view stating drives are the residues of the effect of external stimulation, which caused alterations in the living matter during phylogenesis. Proceeding on these arguments, we claimed that the death drive could be designated as the phylogenetic precipitates of the repetitive traumatic experiences and accumulations of the prolonged stage of social history rather than being solely biological; and that this thesis of the death drive, which can be referred as historical and not originary, could show a greater consistency with the whole of Freud's text.
Based on this context, I will, in this sequel, attempt to present a juxtaposed/ “organicised” version of interaction beyond a notion similar to a mélange between life and death drives and discuss the self-assertion of the death drive by loading on the libido by correlating with various qualities of it and the distinctive object relation configurations interrelated to the traumatic, with some mentions of clinical phenomena. In the final part of the text, the contributions of a historical (and not originary) designation of the death drive trying to overcome the contradictions and problems that the classical approach of death drive bears, as well as the possible contributions on a metapsychological level will discussed.