You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
This article examines, in a philosophical and psychoanalytic context, the idea that subjectivity can emerge only within an intersubjective relational field. Intersubjectivity is defined as a jointly constructed field of meaning formed through the unconsciousinteractions of the analyst and the analysand, and the analytic process is discussed in its emotional, intuitive, and reflective dimensions. Hegel's struggle for recognition, Merleau-Ponty's “intercorporeality”, Winnicott's “mirroring mother”, Bion's concept of transformation in hallucinosis, and Ogden's “analytic third” all demonstrate that the subject is always already born into a relational field and that meaning is created collaboratively between individuals. Subjectivity is understood not merely as an individual structure but as a mode of existence shaped within an intersubjective world one inhabits from birth and is shared inseparably. From this perspective, the unconscious is also conceived not as an individual formation but as a relational one; an active, creative, and dynamic field created jointly between two minds in which feelings, thoughts, and meanings take root and transform. It is emphasised that the analyst can approach unsymbolized material with a receptive state of mind that can arise only within such a field and when he can combine his dreaming capacity, negative capability, and, in Bion's terms, a state of “being in hallucinosis.” The “third” field co-created by analyst and analysand is regarded as the essential condition for approaching emotional truth and enabling therapeutic transformation. This shared field, through cycles of attunement and disruption arising in the emotional atmosphere between the two, makes possible the psychic development of both the patient and the analyst. Clinical examples illustrate how the analytic third emerges within an intersubjective field and how past experiences are reinterpreted in the “here and now.” In conclusion, psychoanalysis is defined as a “co-dreaming” field in which emotional truth is held and reflected jointly.