You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
The contents of this paper represent the continuation of a line of research which we have been working on for some years: our principal interest is the “analytical relationship” and, in particular, its transformative functions. The method adopted, that of the on-going study, takes Freudian theory as its central point of reference, and uses the criteria and procedures of “operational models” which, as we all know, make it possible to approach the object being studied in a convergent way, whether that object be a concrete phenomenon or a theoretical concept (Cargnelutti and Cerletti 1981; Cargnelutti 1987; Muratori 1981 and 1987).
Our interest in the theme of transformations in psychoanalysis derives from an experience which the analyst often has, and which is not unknown in the patient either, when there is a wavering between two opposite impressions with regard to what the analytic treatment is achieving. Sometimes in the course of an analysis we feel that the work is fruitful and that notable changes are taking place, while at other times our impression is that in reality nothing is changing at all.
This experience occurs during every phase of the analysis and goes hand in hand with its development; one is not usually aware of it, but it