You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
Our reply to Jeanne Wolff Bernstein claims that she is an ideal reader for the type of analysis we offered: because she is familiar with the European literary tradition, because she so obviously harbors a sense of the interface of literature and psychoanalysis, and—not least—because she herself has so meticulously studied the nuanced details of our diagnosis. We concur, furthermore, with the melancholia diagnosis she attributes to us and understand why our analysis led her—almost by association—to remember the models of earlier theorists of melancholy and depression. However, we caution that these three are merely a few among many models and that they should not, in any case, be considered definitive (as if models could ever be ultimate arbiters in an enterprise such as the posthumous analysis of a historical figure).
George Rousseau, Ph.D. is Research Professor of the Humanities at De Montfort University and holder of a Leverhulme Trust Award for 1999-2001. He is a winner of the james Clifford Prize, awarded by the American Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies for the best article of the year.
Caroline Warman, Ph.D. was Leverhulme Research Fellow at De Montfort University (1999-2000). Her most recent book is Sade: From Materialism to Pornography.
Finally, in our reply we petition for a more historical approach than the one found in Bernstein's response or in the writings of the three thinkers whose approach has influenced her thinking.