You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
In this discussion, I take up Kathleen Roberts Skerrett's (this issue) position that the concept of self-respect offers itself as the better road to addressing issues of power and its abuses when it comes to sexual harassment than does consent, a concept that she shows to be imbricated in the dynamics of gendered inequalities. Drawing on her analysis of David Mamet's Oleanna (1992), I challenge self-respect as the ideologically vacant category Skerrett implies it to be. I argue instead that in its regulatory, prescriptive undertones, self-respect is as porous to gendered value judgments though it may present as natural and self-evident. In disagreement with Skerrett's dismissal of consent as a useful compass to navigate questions of harassment, I propose that consent and its operations need to be further theorized in relation to the unconscious, desire, and temporality before the concept can adequately perform the labor we are asking of it.