You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
As non-heternormative sexualities and identities increasingly gain acceptance, the author asks why Lingiardi, Fox, and Ariza each take up different concerns related to gay male sexuality development and object choice at this time. Citing a current rise in tribalism, binary thinking, and societal-level splitting, the author contends that these papers compellingly argue against the loss of symbolic and psychic gay spaces to the benefit of all.