The vexed debate within the field of queer theory over what it means to be queer in the social world—the anti-social thesis—serves as this article’s conceptual and theoretical starting point, but also is that which, as I argue, The Argonauts seeks to disrupt. This article thereby mobilizes Nelson’s autobiographical memoir to question whether a departure from privileging only these negative modes of being—anti-sociality—is in order. I argue that The Argonauts offers three exciting lines of flight that build upon and extend contemporary debates in queer theory: (a) the queerness of pregnancy as a self-shattering experience; (b) the experience of becoming undone alongside one another; and (c) the queer ordinary as the lifelong task of finding spaces—whether they be political, cultural, or interpersonal—that are “good enough.”