You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
From the beginning, the Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review has been a joint Nordic project and the office of Editor-in-Chief has rotated among the Scandinavian countries. With the completion of this volume, it is time for me to step down, and from 2008, the editorial office will move from Copenhagen to Stockholm.
It is with great pleasure that I hand over the editorship to David Titelman from the Swedish Psychoanalytical Society. David Titelman has for many years combined research and psychoanalytic practice and has contributed to the different kinds of tasks involved in running the journal: as referee, book reviewer, as author and since 2003, as member of the editorial board. With David Titelman as Editor-in-Chief, the journal will be in the best of hands.
The composition of the Editorial Board will not be changed except for the Editor-in-Chief. I will still, for some time, represent the Danish Society.
As this is my last Editorial, I would like to thank everybody who has contributed to the journal: authors, referees, readers as well as all those who have taken part in the production of the journal. Especially, I would like to thank our English-language editor for many years, Keith Jones, the head of the publishing house, Thomas Kaarsted, and the editorial board for an inspiring collaboration, and for help and support.
The issue comprises six papers and one brief communication. Two of the papers have originally been presented orally at the XX Nordic Psychoanalytic Congress in Oslo, 2006. The theme of the Congress was thinking in a psychoanalytic perspective, and the two papers deal with this subject. Siri Erika Gullestad introduces the theme and Arne Jemstedt presents first and foremost Bion's theory on thinking and illustrates it with case material. Grigoris Vaslamatzis from Greece presents a paper which is very much in line with Arne Jemstedt's. He explores moments of incoherence and confusion in the analysand which he tries to understand with the help of Bion and Od