You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
Drawing attention to the parallels between the artist’s and the psychoanalyst’s creative act, I will argue that the art of psychoanalysis, similar to the artistic, creative process, is constructing an environment that invites and sustains a certain disorienting chaos before sorting through and working out how to make use of one’s experiences. The psycho-analytic and artistic discourse both investigate the position from which something is generated: the contradictions and multitudes of this ‘self’ in the place of the designated ‘I.’ Psychoanalysis creates a holding environment that makes the undoing of our constructed selves possible, what Kristeva calls the making and unmaking of the speaking subject, and opens up ways to formulate our desires’ complexities and reconstruct an orienting sense of self, in Winnicott’s words: to postulate the existence of the self. The analytic experience teaches us to say yes to a certain hunger and embrace the appetite we thought of as too large, too gluttonous and uncomfortable. It helps us become more familiar with the apparitions of this hunger and makes them part of ourselves.