You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
Budapest, March 22, 1910
VII., Erzsébet-körút 54
Dear Professor,
This will, I think, be my last letter before Nuremberg.—I gratefully acknowledge your arrangements for the trip and will appear on Sunday evening. It is not clear to me from your letter whether I should reserve a sleeping berth for the night trip from Vienna to Nuremberg for myself, or whether one of the places reserved by colleague Steiner has been designated for me. I therefore request a very brief communication in this regard via correspondence card.—Pfister wrote to me in great detail; a very nice person, full of enthusiasm for the cause. Strangely, he believes that “our Freud has endowed theology with a methodology that is of no less significance for it than spectral analysis is for physics.” He doesn't yet suspect that the analytical conception carried through to its conclusion does away with theology. He has yet to come to that.
The news of the clinicians' conspiracy has indeed made me uncomfortable. This could be the beginning of a crusade against us, in which clerics and “liberals,” united, turn against us. I am certain only of the fact that we can count on the understanding of one sector of the population—neurotics themselves. That is evident, for instance, in the interest that these people bring to my “Lélekelemzés.” Will you also mention the possibility of such a holy war in your lecture on the prospects of psychoanalysis?1 —
I would like to recommend to you another point for consideration (in case you haven't come upon it yourself). That is the sociological significance of our analyses in the sense that in our analyses we investigate the real conditions in the various levels of society, cleansed of all hypocrisy and conventionalism, just as they are mirrored in the individual. The analysis of a typesetter, for instance, gave me the opportunity to see clearly the terrorism that so horribly oppresses the individual worker from the side of the party, and the action toward him that mocks all “broth