You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
1 June 1909
Vienna, IX. Berggasse 19
Dear Dr. Jones,
I enjoy the frequency of your letters and as you see I hasten to give you answering. Many thanks for your interesting news about your work, I expect you become soon a reader of the articles announced. To be sure the essay on the parallel Oedipus-Hamlet will interest me most. When I wrote down what seemed to me the solution of the mystery I had not undertaken a special inquiry into the Hamlet-literature, but I knew what the results of our German writers were and saw that even Goethe had missed the marks.1
Permit me to put you right as soon as possible about Pfister. He has nothing at all to [do] with Emmanuelism and the like; I know him personally by a visit he paid me last month. He is perfectly in earnest, a scientific man and a very kind character, nay a charming man, very modest too. Grant him all the rights due to one of our crew and not the worst man as far as I can see.
As for my visit in Worcester I do not know if Stanley Hall be to blame. He writes me: “We have given out no notices as yet; nevertheless, in some way the news of your coming has reached a number of people in this country who have been profoundly interested in your work and have written us expressing their pleasure and their desire to hear whatever you may have to say to us.” So you see I will have some audience at least and as for those who will not be present I will be sorry, but not disconsolate. In opposition to you I expect nothing at all from the big men: Putnam, Morton Prince etc. and hope, you may not find [yourself] disappointed with them. As for myself I did not choose my place, I donot want to put anyone out of his way or his plans, I am going to where I have been invited and may securely leave arrangements to Stanley Hall.
Nor will I give my lectures in English. It would be hard to me and put me at a great disadvantage against hearers and critics. I got the University's publication at the former celebration ten years ago and could see,