You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
Internationale Psychoanalytische Vereinigung
Küsnach-Zürich, 29 July 1913
Dear Professor Freud,
I am still waiting for the announcement of a lecture from your side. As I would like to have the programme printed soon, I should be grateful for an early reply.
Many thanks for sending me your offprints. I must, however, point out that in your paper “An Evidential Dream,”1 which in other respects shows the fine qualities I have always admired in your writings, you put forward a conception of our views2 which rests on a misunderstanding. This misunderstanding turns on the conception of the actual conflict, which for us is not the petty vexation of the moment but the problem of adaptation. A second misunderstanding seems to be that you think we deny the wish-fulfilment theory of dreams. We fully admit the soundness of the wish-fulfilment theory, but we maintain that this way of interpreting dreams touches only the surface, that it stops at the symbol, and that further interpretation is possible. When, for instance, a coitus wish appears in a dream, this wish can be analysed further, since this archaic expression with its tiresome monotony of meaning needs retranslating into another medium. We recognize the soundness of the wish-fulfilment theory up to a certain point, but we go beyond it. In our view it does not exhaust the meaning of the dream.
With best regards,
Yours sincerely, JUNG
“Ein Traum als Beweismittel,” Zeitschrift I: 1 (1913) = SE XII.
In the paper Freud makes no reference to Jung but speaks of “misgivings in the minds of so many psycho-analysts, among them some well-known ones” (SE XII, p. 273).