You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
228 Seestrasse, Küsnacht-Zürich [day and month?] 19231
Dear Professor Freud,
The purpose of this letter is to refer the following case to your medical authority:
Herr J—-, who will shortly have the honour of introducing himself to you personally, is suffering from an obsessional neurosis. He has been treated by me for two years, but the illness brought many interruptions the reason for which will become apparent from the report drawn up by the patient himself. In the course of treatment he acquired a more intimate knowledge of his sexual fantasies and also of your scientific writings. The insights they afforded alleviated his symptoms so much that he even began dreaming about you. The wish to be treated by you personally was so unmistakable that I felt it my duty to do everything in my power to support his recuperative efforts and to facilitate his treatment at your hands. The unquestioned help which your views afforded him have prepared him for further progress in this direction.
Herr J—- is by profession a diplomat, very intelligent and very well-to-do. His neurosis is certainly severe, and in addition he is no longer young, but at the same time he is sufficiently flexible for me to refer him to you with a good conscience. Moreover his decision to turn to you for help as a result of the treatment was so logical and convincing that I never doubted its rightness for a moment. For the symptomatology of the case I must refer you to the patient's own report, to which I have nothing to add.2
In the sincere hope, dear Professor, that you will favour the patient with your help, I remain,
With respectful regards,
Very truly yours, DR. JUNG
Handwritten. Jung wrote only the year date, leaving space for the day and month to be filled in. He was living at the same place, but the houses had been renumbered in the intervening years.
The following information was supplied by Aniela Jaffé: “The case involved a Jew who could not or would not acknowledge his Jewishne