(Final version accepted 12 February 2010)

Psychoanalysis is an art of reflection, i.e. it tries to facilitate the subject's retrieval of his own self. The ‘material’ to be reflected upon consists of the products of human symbolization. But there are two views of reflection. In one, the self is searched in a temporal, structural and procedural ‘anterior’ (the model of archaeology). In the other the self is to be found in a still evolving meaning process, i.e. it resides in a ‘future’ (the model of teleology). Both these pictures are common in psychoanalysis. The aim of this paper is to study the figures of symbolization through the archaeology/teleology reflection model. The author tries to show that ‘symbol’ leans on archaeology while ‘metaphor’ comprises a teleological conception. In order to show the relevance of this finding, the author draws the outlines of both an archaeological and a teleological model in psychoanalysis. It is stated that the former builds on an inherent symbol model while the figure for the latter is metaphor.