You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
There is so much to be appreciative of in the article, “The Enigma of Ana: A Psychoanalytic Exploration of Pro-Anorexia Internet Forums.” The author stakes out quite an ambitious project for himself: “ … we will understand both more about the psychodynamics of eating disorders as well as the complex relationship between cyberspace and mental health.” Indeed, this article is an open and eye-opening introduction to online pro-ana sites that promote and encourage self-starvation and other dangerous eating disorder behaviors. The author firmly asserts that a nonjudgmental approach to these sites, their function, and their effects as seen through a psychoanalytic lens could lead to an understanding of both the positive and negative in the online pro-ana sites.
This discussion will not dispute or challenge the splendid contribution this article makes toward detoxifying the nature of pro-ana web forums. The author demonstrates, both in narrative style and with his empirical approach, the “double-edged” quality of Internet pro-ana sites. Rather, I would like to focus on the clinical case which is the emotional center piece of the article, meant to demonstrate the positive and negative consequences of his patient’s use of those sites; and especially on the experience of being a reader of this work. I will be suggesting that some of the peak moments in the case material as well as emotional reactions by this reader represent an enactment around desire, sensuality, and sexuality in the transference and countertransference. To be clear, I am using “enactment” to refer those crucial clashes in the unconscious of both patient and analyst that illuminate and make possible important shifts in the treatment.
Much is made in the elaboration of Sara’s history of the chronic intrusiveness of her mother. The ongoing misattunement, the repeated impingements on Sara’s sense of security, and the hostile negation of experiences of comfort all add up to a classic case of developmental trauma (