You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
This contribution in the Systemic Thinking and Practice Series introduces us to the concept of subject-positioning within organisations, which is developed into a model for intervening in, and consulting to, human dilemmas in organisations. The framework is akin to that of a
practice handbook, offering a theoretical introduction and model, illustrating how these ideas can be put into practice, and an array of exercises to develop understanding and technique. Extensive case examples are offered, along with perspectives from the consultant and client position. While the authors' stance is one of working at a cognitive level with systems and behaviours, readers of this journal will find that some ideas resonate with a number of psychodynamic and organisational theories. I will, therefore, attempt some linking across theoretical streams where this might facilitate connection to a broader field.
Semantic Polarities, as the authors have named the model, represents a combination of ideas that draw upon three streams of thought: discourse theory and semantic polarities, positioning theory, and dialogue theory. Underpinned by Campbell and Groenbaek's extensive experience in consulting in the UK and Denmark, respectively, Semantic Polarities is offered as a means to surface and recognise organisational tensions as they are encountered in individuals and teams. The methodology speaks a supportive language, building on appreciation and positive connotation, to promote dialogues between players that ultimately facilitate growth and change. These concepts themselves are positioned in a constructionist approach that seeks meaning from social interactions, and holds to multiple perspectives. Time dimensions are important, both in recognising how things are now, and how they might be desired or envisaged in a near future.
In the opening chapters, the authors build their model of Semantic Polarities from this conceptual ground, suggesting that individuals make sense of the world, and