You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
Nurse Lucy Letby was accused of multiple murders of babies in a neonatal ward and was given concurrent life sentences that meant she would be in prison for the rest of her life. She was never seen to murder a baby and the evidence against her is, therefore, circumstantial. However, it convinced the jury who were unanimous in condemning her as a serial murderer. Since her incarceration there has been much controversy over the case especially around the medical evidence. Various aspects of the case have, post-trial, been re-examined. First, the medical evidence as to how and why these babies died has been challenged, second the statistics that were used to prove that Lucy Letby was a constant, likewise, and third there has been an attempt to discredit the medical expert witness for the prosecution. My focus in this article is on Lucy Letby. I question her possible motivation for killing and suggest that she lacks the psychopathology that we might expect to find in a killer nurse, that she might in fact be innocent. She may have been the object of projective identification or the bad object that enabled splitting in the institution. I suggest that, as a single childless woman, she was the ideal subject to carry the projections of those around her lost for an explanation as to why there were so many neonatal deaths.