You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
Patients who suffer from severe vulnerability in the narcissistic realm but who otherwise enjoy impressively intact ego functioning can sometimes be helped to endure the rigors of psychoanalysis in the early months of treatment by the analyst’s emphasis on, or even exaggeration of, the affirmative elements in ordinary psychoanalytic interventions. Loewald’s (1960) concept of “positive neutrality” is explored in an effort to determine an acceptable element of affirmation in the initial analytic stance taken toward these patients, and case material is offered to illustrate the application of these principles in the first fifteen months of psychoanalytic work with a high-functioning but narcissistically vulnerable man. It is thought that this stance, used judiciously, does not compromise the full emergence and analysis of the transference but rather enhances the process. To illustrate this progression, a session is presented from the thirtieth month in the treatment of the same analysand, when the affirmative emphasis had receded and more ordinary interpretive activity had begun to dominate the analytic interchange.
Faculty member and supervising analyst at the Massachusetts Institute for Psychoanalysis; clinical instructor in psychiatry/psychology, Harvard Medical School/Massachusetts General Hospital.
The author would like to thank Gerald Adler, M.D., Howard Corwin, M.D., Ralph Engle, M.D., and Sam Kaplan, M.D. for their helpful responses to an earlier version of this article.
The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child 50, ed. Albert J. Solnit, Peter B. Neubauer, Samuel Abrams, and A. Scott Dowling (Yale University Press, copyright © 1995 by Albert J. Solnit, Peter B. Neubauer, Samuel Abrams, and A. Scott Dowling).