You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
This paper offers an overview of Erik Erikson's contribution to psychoanalysis, contrasting the humanistic perspective from which he viewed psychoanalysis with the biological perspective adopted by Heinz Hartmann. The vehicle for this comparison and for the explication of Erikson's extension of the work of Freud and Hartmann is Erikson's analysis of Freud's Irma dream, as presented in his Dream Specimen paper. I hope to show that: (1) Erikson's analysis of Freud's Irma dream provides a masterful illustration of the richness and complexity of past and current life themes and conflicts that inform the dreamer's construction of the manifest surface of the dream. (2) Erikson's examination of the relationship between the manifest content of the dream and the current life context of the dreamer leads him to propose a connection between trauma and the origins of the dream. This view complements Freud's discovery of the instinctual motivation for dreaming and anticipates subsequent discoveries concerning the role of dreams and REM sleep in defensive ego functioning and adaptation. (3) The Dream Specimen paper presents readers with a humanistic ego psychology that rests
Faculty, Psychoanalytic Institute of New England East (PINE); faculty, Boston Psychoanalytic Institute (BPSI); faculty, Massachusetts Institute for Psychoanalysis (MIP).
Presented at the Fall 1994 meetings of the American Psychoanalytic Association as part of the panel, “Classics Revisited: Erik H. Erikson's Childhood and Society and ‘The Dream Specimen Paper,’” December 17, 1994.
The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child 53, ed. Albert J. Solnit, Peter B. Neubauer, Samuel Abrams, and A. Scott Dowling (Yale University Press, copyright © 1998 by Albert J. Solnit, Peter B. Neubauer, Samuel Abrams, and A. Scott Dowling).
upon—but is subtly different from—the work of Hartmann and the other biologically oriented analysts of his day. In this sense, Erikson's paper is an elegant “specimen” of ego psychology carried to its most creative heights.