You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
The author describes the difference between empathy and sympathy, empathy being the ability to put oneself in the other’s place and to feel what he is feeling, and sympathy, the spontaneous feeling of benevolence toward the other, sharing his happiness or supporting him in his suffering. He insists on the importance of not confusing empathy and sympathy. Some inter-subjectivists mainly in the USA and more so from those of identify themselves as members of the inter relational school and of the interpersonal school but also some members of the American Association, hence of the IPA, who prone the analyst’s self-disclosure do indeed confuse the two to the point empathy and sympathy are synonymous. Empathy plays a major role in the analyst’s listening and the tact of his interventions. In it’s strict meaning, it doesn’t interfere with the analyst’s neutrality in order not to disturb the analysand’s free-associations and our availability in our free-floating attention to his verbalizations and the emotions induce in us. Our role isn’t to apply our theories, but to assist the analysand in his discovery of his deep self.