In the three reports, it is suggested that writing is a form of “resistance” that enables the analyst “not to die”, that the treatments of his or her patients continue, even through the latency period between childhood and adulthood. It is important to reduce internal splits (due to traumas) by becoming aware of the collusions between his or her history and that of the patient, as well as external splits by raising questions about the impact of the “visual” (traumatic and desymbolizing or symbolizing and constructive).