Issue 137 articlesIntroductionp. 1Arnold D. RichardsPsychoanalysis as Art and ScienceIntroduction: Musings on the Question: Is Psychoanalysis a Science or an Art?p. 2Daniel S. BenvenisteArticlesOur Secular Religionp. 13Robert BergmanDiscussionDiscussion of Robert Bergman's Article "Our Secular Religion". What Sort of a Thing is Psychoanalysis, Who's to Say, and What of It?p. 19Margaret Crastnopol (Peggy)ResponseReply to Margaret Crastnopol's Discussion of his Paperp. 24Robert BergmanArticlesSeven Basic Emotional Systems in the Brain and their Implications for the Human Conditionp. 25Lucy BivenDiscussionDiscussion of Lucy Biven's Article: “Seven Basic Emotional Systems in the Brain and their Implications for the Human Condition”p. 44Susan Kavaler-AdlerResponseResponse to Dr. Kavaler-Adlerp. 55Lucy BivenArticlesPsychoanalysis: Art and/or Science? A Brief Contribution from Quantum Mechanicsp. 59Gerald J. GargiuloDiscussionResponse to Gerald Gargiulo's Article, “Psychoanalysis: Art and/or Science? A Brief Contribution from Quantum Mechanics”p. 63Merle MolofskyResponseResponse to Merle Molofskyp. 66Gerald J. GargiuloArticlesIs Psychoanalysis a Science or an Art?p. 68Jeff H. GollandDiscussionDiscussion of “Is Psychoanalysis a Science or an Art?” by Jeffrey H. Gollandp. 75Leonie SullivanArticlesPsychoanalysis: Science or Artp. 81Romulo LanderDiscussionDiscussion of Psychoanalysis: Science or Art by Romulo Landerp. 88Arthur LeonoffResponseReply to Arthur Leonoff's Discussionp. 94Romulo LanderArticlesHysteria: From Hystera to Histriop. 96Henry Zvi LothaneDiscussionDiscussion of Article by Zvi Lothane, MDp. 110Mehmet Sagman Kayatekin & Zerrin Emel KayatekinResponseResponse to Professor M. Sagaman Kayetakinp. 115Henry Zvi LothaneArticlesThree Analysts, Five Opinionsp. 118Merle MolofskyDiscussionDiscussion of Three Analysts, Five Opinions by Merle Molofskyp. 125Kimberly KleinmanArticlesGeorg Groddeck and the Interrelation of Art and Science in Psychoanalysisp. 127Austin RatnerDiscussionReview of “Georg Groddeck and the Interrelation of Art and Science in Psychoanalysis”p. 136Mark F. PosterDiscussion of the Article by Austin Ratner “George Groddeck and the Interelation of Art and Science in Psychoanalyis”p. 142Marco ConciResponseReply to Poster's and Conci's Discussions of My Paperp. 145Austin RatnerArticlesPsychoanalysis: Art or Science?p. 147Arlene Kramer RichardsDiscussionDiscussion of Arlene Richards's Paper Psychoanalysis: Science or Art?p. 150Adriana S. PrenglerArticlesScience Needs Criticism: Debating the Clinical Aspects of Diverging Theoretical Schoolsp. 155Joseph Schachter, Judith S. Schachter & Horst KächeleDiscussionCritique on the Article: Science Needs Criticism: Debating the Clinical Aspects of Diverging Theoretical Schoolsp. 165Zerrin Emel Kayatekin & Mehmet Sagman KayatekinResponseResponse to Kayatekin Discussionp. 169Joseph Schachter, Judith S. Schachter & Horst KacheleArticlesThe Facts about the Neubauer Twin Study: An Interview about Controversy or a Controversial Interview?p. 171Lois OppenheimDiscussionEthical Questions Remain in Controversial Twins Study: Further Information and Sources are Required to Find Resolvep. 189Adam M. Kelmenson & Ilene WiletsResponseRebuttal of Response by Kelmenson and Wiletsp. 197Lois OppenheimArticlesBook Review: The Emergence of Analytic Oneness: Into the Heart of Psychoanalysis, by Ofra Eshel (Routledge, 2019).p. 202Nathan SzajnbergResponseResponse to Nathan Szajnberg's Review of My Bookp. 207Ofran EshelAuthor Biosp. 212Author Emailsp. 223
Issue 239 articlesEditor's Introductionp. 1Douglas KirsnerOrganization and Institutes: ArticlesThe Troubling Problems of Knowledge in Psychoanalytic Institutesp. 3Fred BuschDiscussionLet a Hundred Flowers Bloom: A Commentary on Fred Busch's Paperp. 27Douglas A. ChavisResponseResponse to Chavisp. 47Fred BuschDiscussionEmbracing Uncertainties: A Discussion of Fred Busch's the Troubling Problems Of Knowledge In Psychoanalytic Institutesp. 50Jane S. HallResponseResponse to Responsesp. 60Fred BuschOrganization and Institutes: ArticlesWhat is Wrong with Psychoanalysis: The Problems Created by Experience-Distant Theory and How to Correct themp. 62Henry FriedmanDiscussionResponse to F. Busch and H. Friedmanp. 75Cecilio PaniaguaOn Analysts' Hostility to the Method of Free Associationp. 82Henry Zvi LothanePsychoanalysis as the Tower of Babelp. 84H. Shmuel ErlichResponseResponse to Responses to my Paper: What is Wrong with Psychoanalysis: The Problems Created by Experience Distant Theory and how to Correct themp. 95Henry FriedmanResponse to Friedmanp. 100Fred BuschOrganization and Institutes: ArticlesUnresolvable Controversies?: Investigating the Unconscious in Groupsp. 102Robert D. Hinshelwood‘Psychoanalytic Institutional Life and Its Discontents: Then and Now. A Bionian Analysis.’: A Panel Paper for the ‘Oral History Workshop, (82)—’Revisiting Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego.’ (Nellie Thompson, Chair). The American Psychoanalytic Association's Winter Meetings, New York City, (February 13, 2020).p. 119Joseph AguayoPersonal and Political History of the New York Psychoanalytic Society and Institutep. 138Arnold RichardsDiscussionPersonal and Political History of the New York Psychoanalytic Society and Institutep. 151Merle MolofskyOrganization and Institutes: ArticlesThe Nature, Structure and Experience of an Experimental Distance Learning Psychoanalytic Center for Trainingp. 155Jill Savege Scharff & David E. ScharffHistory of the Washington Baltimore Center for Psychoanalysisp. 174Anita BryceAn Essay On Psychoanalytic Training and Identity for the International Journal of Controversial Discussionsp. 180Kerry Kelly NovickThe Role and Decline of Power in Psychoanalytic Organizations©p. 188Mark LeffertNotes on Didactic Seminars and Infantalization in the Candidate/Institute Relationship: Paper invited by Dr. Kirsner for the International Journal of Controversial Discussionsp. 200Barnaby B. BarrattA Better Future for Psychoanalysis?: The Impact of The Decline of The Politics of Oldp. 214Warren R. ProcciNarcissism and the Psychoanalytic Model of Personality: ArticlesNarcissism, Echoism, Perfection, and Death: Towards a Structural Psychoanalysisp. 226Trveor PedersonNarcissism and the Psychoanalytic Model of Personality: DiscussionNeither a Reflection Nor an Echo: Searching for a Response to Pedersonp. 303John S. AuerbachNarcissism and the Psychoanalytic Model of Personality: ResponseWaiting and Worshiping at the Alter: Reply to Auerbachp. 340Trevor PedersonNarcissism and the Psychoanalytic Model of Personality: DiscussionLordship and Bondage—Echoism and Narcissism: Reflections on Pederson's “Narcissism, Echoism, Perfection, and Death: Towards a Structural Psychoanalysis”p. 357Ronnie CarmeliNarcissism and the Psychoanalytic Model of Personality: ResponseReply to Carmelip. 365Trevor PedersonFreud: ArticlesFreud and Anti-Semitismp. 385Douglas KirsnerThe Fallacy of Pathological Patriarchy as the Cause of the Oedipus Complexp. 395Michael J. PoffPsychoanalysis as Science or Art?: ArticlesPsychoanalysis: Science or Art? Science and Artp. 431Rebecca Coleman CurtisPsychoanalysis as Science or Art?: DiscussionArt and Science. Infantile Sexuality and the Oedipus Complex. A Discussion of Rebecca Coleman Curtis's article, “Psychoanalysis: Science or Art? Science and Art.”p. 453Michael J. PoffPsychoanalysis as Science or Art?: ResponseOedipus Today: Reply to Michael Poffp. 463Rebecca Coleman CurtisPsychoanalysis as Science or Art?: Articles“As-If Countertransference: A Chinese Experience”p. 465Yikun Wu & Nathan M. SzajnbergPsychoanalysis as Science or Art?: DiscussionAs-If Countertransference: A Chinese Experience”p. 494Francis BaudryAs-If Countertransference: A Chinese Experiencep. 499Jing ChenPsychoanalysis as Science or Art?: ResponseResponses to Dr. Baudry and Jeng Chenp. 502Nathan Szajnberg & Yikun WuResponse to Loray Daws' Review of Susan Kavaler-Adler's Book: “The Klein-Winnicott Dialectic: Transformative Metapsychology And Interactive Clinical Theory”p. 504Susan Kavaler-AdlerPsychoanalysis as Science or Art?: ArticlesReview: The Klein-Winnicott Dialectic: Transformative New Metapsychology and Interactive Clinical Theory. By Susan Kavaler-Adlerp. 507Loray DawsAuthor BiosAuthor Biosp. 554
Issue 310 articlesResponseMy Problem with Fred Busch's: The Troubling Problems of Knowledge in Psychoanalytic Institutesp. 1Henry FriedmanResponse to Henry Friedman's Fred Busch Problemp. 13Fred BuschFurther Response to Fred Buschp. 18Jane S. HallArticlesThe Death Drive is Alive and Wellp. 19David JachimDiscussion of the Articles by David JachimResponse to David Jachimp. 21Jeffrey L. EatonArticlesThe Learned Analyst (or Everything an Analyst Should Know)p. 23David JachimDiscussion of the Articles by David JachimResponse to “The Learned Analyst”p. 27Judith K. EekhoffArticlesTo Three or Not to Three: That is Not the Questionp. 28David JachimDiscussion of the Articles by David JachimResponse to David Jachim's to Three or Not to Threep. 33Gunther PerdigaoAuthor Biosp. 39
Issue 433 articlesAbout the Contributorsp. 2Forewordp. 9Jeffrey SternIntroductionp. 11Lucille SpiraArticleRage and Creativity: How Second Generation Feminist Thought Collective Influenced Psychoanalysisp. 14Arlene Kramer RichardsDiscussionWomen in Psychoanalytic Theory: Two Steps Forward, Still One Step Back: Response to Arlene Kramer Richards' “Rage and Creativity”p. 28Rosemary H. BalsamResponseResponse to Rosemary Balsamp. 34Arlene Kramer RichardsDiscussionThe Trauma of Having No Voice Response to Arlene Kramer Richards Paper: Rage and Creativityp. 36Sandra E. CohenResponseResponse to Sandra Cohenp. 43Arlene Kramer RichardsDiscussionSelf-Agency in the Woman, Acceptance of Difference: Discussion of Arlene Kramer Richards' Paper, “Rage and Creativity”p. 45Paula L. EllmanResponseResponse to Paula Ellmanp. 52Arlene Kramer RichardsDiscussionA Letter to My Sons, July 2020: Response to Arlene Kramer Richards' “Rage and Creativity”p. 54Alison FeitResponseResponse to Alison Feitp. 60Arlene Kramer RichardsDiscussionFreud's Ribp. 62William FriedResponseReply to Bill Friedp. 67Arlene Kramer RichardsDiscussionIncreasing Psychic Space to See Something New, to Think Something New, to Be Part of a New Thought Collective: Discovering the Female Cervixp. 69Nancy R. GoodmanResponseResponse to Nancy Goodmanp. 82Arlene Kramer RichardsDiscussionTowards a “Female Paradigm” in Psychoanalysisp. 84Cordelia Schmidt-HellerauResponseReply to Cordelia Schmidt-Helleraup. 90Arlene Kramer RichardsDiscussionFeminism Revisited: A Rejoinder to Arlene Kramer Richards' Examination of the Impact of Feminism on Psychoanalysisp. 92Dorothy Evans HolmesResponseResponse to Holmesp. 98Arlene Kramer RichardsDiscussionA Discussion Prompted by Arlene Kramer Richards “Rage and Creativity: How Second Generation Feminist Thought Collective Influenced Psychoanalysis”p. 100Kimberly KleinmanResponseResponse to Kimberly Kleinmanp. 105Arlene Kramer RichardsDiscussionFeminism and Psychoanalysis: A Discussion of Arlene Kramer Richards' “Rage and Creativity”p. 107Nancy KulishResponseResponse to Nancy Kulishp. 119Arlene Kramer RichardsDiscussionTo Be A Feminist and To Be a Psychoanalyst, That is an Answered Question: Response to Arlene Kramer Richards' paper, “Rage and Creativity: How Second Generation Feminist Thought Collective Influenced Psychoanalysis”p. 121Merle MolofskyResponseResponse to Merle Molofskyp. 128Arlene Kramer RichardsDiscussionThe Prejudice Within: A Discussion of Arlene Kramer Richards' “Rage and Creativity”p. 130Jack Novick & Kerry Kelly NovickResponseResponse to Jack Novick and Kerry Kelly Novickp. 140Arlene Kramer RichardsDiscussionWhen Prejudice Comes Up Against Ambition: Response to Arlene Kramer Richards' “Rage and Creativity”p. 142Lucille SpiraResponseResponse to Lucille Spirap. 152Arlene Kramer RichardsAppendixWhat We Learned from Proust: Psychological and Social Determinants of Snobbery and Prejudice (2013)p. 154Arlene Kramer Richards & Lucille SpiraWomen's Liberation Movement: From Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopediap. 171July 23, 2020 Issue: Vol. 166, No. 130—Daily Edition 116th Congress (2019–2020)—2nd Session)p. 225
Issue 527 articlesEditor's IntroductionIntroductionp. 1James Tyler CarpenterArticleIdeology, and the Art and Science of Psychoanalysisp. 8Arnold RichardsDiscussionIntroductionp. 13Arnold Richards & Daniel S. BenvenisteMusings on “Psychoanalysis in Crisis: The Danger of Ideology” by Arnold D. Richardsp. 14Daniel S. BenvenisteIntroductionp. 19James Tyler Carpenter & Burton Norman SeitlerDo Analytic Institutes Eat Their Young? Psychoanalysis/Art, Physics, Psycho-Physics, and a Parable: A Response to Arnold Richards, M.D.p. 20Burton Norman SeitlerIntroductionp. 41Arnold Richards & Joseph F. MeyerIntroductionp. 42James Tyler Carpenter & Joseph F. MeyerPsychoanalysis Partially Reincarnated? A Free Associative Reflection on Conflict and Compromisep. 43Joseph F. MeyerIntroductionp. 50James Tyler Carpenter & Trevor PedersonThe Singular Object of the Oedipal Stage and Earlier Component Objectsp. 51Trevor PedersonIntroductionp. 91Arnold Richards & Sandra BuechlerIntroductionp. 92James Tyler Carpenter & Sandra BuechlerThe Truth Could Set Psychoanalysis Free: A Response to “Psychoanalysis in Crisis: The Danger of Ideology” by Arnold Richards, M.D.p. 93Sandra BuechlerIntroductionp. 102James Tyler Carpenter & Sandra E. CohenResponse to Arnold Richards, M.D. Paper Psychoanalysis in Crisis: The Danger of Ideology: How Does Ideology End & The Art of Creating A Life Begin?p. 103Sandra CohenIntroductionp. 110Arnold Richards & Jon MillsCrisis and Ideology In Psychoanalysisp. 111Jon MillsIntroductionp. 128James Tyler Carpenter & Merle MolofskyResponse To Arnold Richards' Article, “Psychoanalysis in Crisis: The Danger of Ideology”: Whose Psychoanalysis? What Crisis?p. 129Merle MolofskyIntroductionp. 136James Tyler Carpenter & Joel WeinbergerThe Crisis of Isolation Psychoanalysis Has Createdp. 137Joel WeinbergerIntroductionp. 146Jane HallResuscitating the (Nearly) Dead Profession of Psychoanalysis: A Review of and Comment on Zagermann, P. (Ed.) (2018). The Future of Psychoanalysis: The Debate about the Training Analyst Systemp. 147Alan Michael KarbelnigIn Praise of Robert H. Abzug's Biography of Rollo May Review of Psyche and Soul in America: The Spiritual Odyssey of Rollo May by Robert Abzugp. 163Daniel S. BenvenisteAfterwordAfterwordp. 166Arnold D. RichardsAbout the Contributorsp. 167